Frankly, do you call this a movie or soft porn that promotes male domination and humiliates women? Wasted my money and time by watching this movie just because some of my friends wanted to watch it badly. This movie just pollutes the minds of our younger generation. Everything from dialogues, sex scenes and acting is poor. The music was a bit good for which I gave one star. Honestly we women are not like this. We also like to have good, clean and natural relationships in our life. We don't always want to get wet and indulge in a submissive relationship. Fifty shades of grey started it and now this title made it worst further. Please come up with some good story-line. Thumbs down. It only frustrated me and nothing else.
Fifty Shades Darker (2017) 1080p YIFY Movie
Fifty Shades Darker (2017) 1080p
While Christian wrestles with his inner demons, Anastasia must confront the anger and envy of the women who came before her.
IMDB: 4.772 Likes
The Synopsis for Fifty Shades Darker (2017) 1080p
Christian and Ana decide to rekindle their relationship, except this time there are no more rules or punishments. As they begin to get used to their newfound relationship, Christian's past begins to haunt Ana as Christian struggles with his innermost thoughts.
The Director and Players for Fifty Shades Darker (2017) 1080p
The Reviews for Fifty Shades Darker (2017) 1080p
Lost my time and self respect as a girl by watching itReviewed byAnnie C.Vote: 1/10
I saw it and yeah...I had fun, laughing I guess? For anyone who tellsme that its a beautiful, love story...f*ck off. It was the cheesiest,corniest, most awkward-comedic film. But hey, it worked for a greatcomedy where the jokes on the film. Seriously, the scenes were so badyou couldn't help but laugh. I think FSoG was better in the aspect totake it a bit more "serious" than FSD. This film completely did notgive a f*ck, I was disappointed that the plots and other characters(Mrs. Robinson, Jack Hyde, Leila) were weak! It had potential toexplore more of these arcs, but it didn't. It was dull and so rushed!Everything was rushed. Even the sex! I'm not expecting full-blown pornbut cut the soundtrack songs out, more positions (not just mostlymissionary all the time), and please bring in some foreplay. How can amovie about risqué intimacy not show good foreplay? Why does Christianalways have an un-emotional face while having sex? No climax either? Inthe books, wasn't he always grinning (or proudly smiling) for hisaccomplishment in giving Ana orgasms? For getting off too? None ofthat...it cuts straight to the next scene. Man...and why was it soSoap-Opera-ish?
I'm not going to lie, I read the trilogy once and I was like,"whatever, this is the junk food to my brain". It wasn't good, butwhatever... it served some purpose. Did I think that it was thegreatest love story? Nope. Did I think it was a great romantic story?Nope. I was honestly intrigued by the fetish that surrounds BDSM. Butit turned out, that even if the sex was hot, it wasn't even portrayedproperly. BDSM is a whole other level.
I was walking out and a lot of the viewers said that it did poorly incapturing the book. Like sure, the sex was there, but thatconnectivity...intimacy... was not. It was like : fight, bang (sex).Argument, bang. Present, bang again. It was repetitive in the sense ofjust make-up sex all the time. Ana is annoying. She doesn't know whatshe wants in the film or in life. Its like she can't take Christian'sdark ways and not kidding, a few seconds later she's okay with it,without any solidifying reason (unless its going down on her or sex) .I feel like FSoG (2015) attempted some direction towards a woman'sviewpoint. Like Ana being "dominant" in the sense of negotiation andchoices. In this film, I'm sorry...she comes off like a gold-digger.She comes off like the only reason she's with him is because he's rich.Its like "I can't be with you, like this...(he gives her a gift), oh, Ilove you!) WTF? She tries so hard to be her own woman, but really endsup being Christian's (and not in the cute way like "Oh, I'm his girl*googly-eyes*) I feel that FSoG (2015) did a better job in where Anahad control and it made sense. Here it's wishy-washy.
Its just a mess, not sexy, everything is rushed that you don'tunderstand the reasoning behind motives. They cut off and rushed greatmoments and characters that could have given the film more sense,romance and great eroticism. Yes its funny because it tries so hard totake itself serious. But that's about it.
Alright the shitty major guilty pleasure franchise based on the shitty twilight fan fiction continues so will it be better or worst than the first one or what? Thats what we will know right now ,firstly it was way way way worst than the 1st one,i wanted to see it at the cinema cause it could be deleted version but in did see it both cinema and leaked version so i said why not specially the director i love his movies so i had some hopes that they could learn from the mistakes but they made it worst the acting was way way way worst even Dakota Johnson she looks great Jarmie Dornan is right in loving her but she was worst than the first one although Grey's pleasures or his bad way in treating her was not harsh as the first one but still his acting was like a falsehood acting even the soundtrack that the first one was perfect at,this one's music was bad only countable songs were good even the sex scenes itself one in the beginnings of the movie wasn't made right but the rest were realistic again because they edited some music its not NC-17 if it was NC17 movie i would've said its great one but no, i just liked the chemistry between them but porn watchers will say its a good one but I'm not a porn watcher I'm saying its a guilty pleasure cause its laughably bad it is good and i could enjoy it without making it a good one again another shitty soft core porn feature film my rating is its not horseshit its triple horseshit or horseshit to the power of 10?? that's why my score is 1/10